programming: be in finance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer science
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer programming
Weight: 0.71
, tv show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.62
, broadcast
Weight: 0.55
, programming language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in finance 1.00
be in finance related careers 0.83
be in finance careers 0.82
be important in banking 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in banking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in banking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(programming, be in finance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(programming, be in finance)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance careers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance related careers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(programming, be in finance careers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(programming, be in finance related careers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(programming, be in finance careers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(programming, be in finance related careers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance related careers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance careers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important in banking)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(programming, be in finance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important in banking)