programming: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer science
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer programming
Weight: 0.71
, tv show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.62
, broadcast
Weight: 0.55
, programming language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
be great for for intp 0.81
is bad now 0.78
has quality question 0.77
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(comedy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(programming, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(comedy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(comedy, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer programming, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer programming, has quality question)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(computer programming, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(computer programming, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(programming, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(programming, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(programming, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(programming, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(programming, be great for for intp)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(programming, be great for for intp)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(programming, be great for for intp)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(programming, be great for for intp)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(comedy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(computer programming, has quality question)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(computer programming, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(programming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)