prohibition: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was created 0.83
was introduced in 1919 0.78
was introduced in 1920s 0.78
was introduced 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(prohibition, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(law, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was created)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was introduced)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(amendment, was created)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(amendment, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(amendment, was introduced)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(amendment, was introduced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(prohibition, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(prohibition, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(prohibition, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(prohibition, was introduced)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was created)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(prohibition, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(amendment, was created)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, was introduced)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(prohibition, was developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)