prohibition: was known as expierment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was known as expierment 1.00
was regarded as issue 0.85
was known as noble expierment 0.85
was regarded as progressive issue 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(prohibition, was known as expierment)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)