prohibition: was regarded as progressive issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was regarded as progressive issue 1.00
was regarded as issue 0.93
was known as expierment 0.82
was known as noble expierment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)