prohibition: was regarded as progressive issue

Property	Similarity
was regarded as progressive issue	1.00
was regarded as issue	0.93
was known as expierment	0.82
was known as noble expierment	0.77

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as issue)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as issue)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(prohibition, was regarded as issue)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(prohibition, was known as expierment)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as issue)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as noble expierment)

Parents	law Weight: 0.66 , policy Weight: 0.65 , rule Weight: 0.65 , provision Weight: 0.62 , movement Weight: 0.60
Siblings	common law Weight: 0.36 , ordinance Weight: 0.36 , amendment Weight: 0.35 , legislation Weight: 0.34 , mandate Weight: 0.34

prohibition: was regarded as progressive issue

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible