projector: be better than tests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than tests 1.00
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(projector, be better than tests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(projector, be better than tests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(projector, be better than tests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(projector, be better than tests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(projector, be better than tests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(projector, be better than tests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)