projector: compare to physical tvs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to physical tvs 1.00
compare to tvs 0.98
compare to physical tvs nowadays 0.97
compare to tvs nowadays 0.96
be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to tvs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(projector, compare to tvs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(projector, compare to tvs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(projector, compare to tvs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)