proportion: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents study
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, amount
Weight: 0.59
Siblings length
Weight: 0.60
, golden ratio
Weight: 0.58
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consequence
Weight: 0.33
, incidence
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
is related 0.99
be related to direct variations 0.78
be related to variations 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(proportion, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(length, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(proportion, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(length, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(length, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(proportion, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(proportion, is related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(proportion, is related)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(proportion, is related)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(proportion, is related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(proportion, be related to variations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(proportion, be related to variations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(proportion, be related to variations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(proportion, be related to direct variations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to variations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(proportion, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(length, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)