proportion: be related to direct variations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents study
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, amount
Weight: 0.59
Siblings length
Weight: 0.60
, golden ratio
Weight: 0.58
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consequence
Weight: 0.33
, incidence
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to direct variations 1.00
be related to variations 0.95
be related 0.78
is related 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(length, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(length, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(length, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(proportion, be related to direct variations)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(proportion, be related to variations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(proportion, be related to variations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(proportion, be related to variations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to variations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(proportion, be related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(proportion, is related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(proportion, is related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(proportion, be related)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(proportion, be related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(proportion, is related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(proportion, is related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(length, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(proportion, be related to direct variations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)