proposal: is effective satire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amendment
Weight: 0.75
, legislation
Weight: 0.70
, recommendation
Weight: 0.67
, policy
Weight: 0.66
, resolution
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.74
, plan
Weight: 0.71
, cap
Weight: 0.62
, decision
Weight: 0.36
, provision
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is effective satire 1.00
is satire 0.95
is juvenalian satire 0.95
be considered satire 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(proposal, is effective satire)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(proposal, is satire)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(proposal, is juvenalian satire)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(proposal, be considered satire)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is satire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(proposal, is satire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(proposal, be considered satire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is juvenalian satire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(proposal, is satire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(proposal, be considered satire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(proposal, be considered satire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(proposal, is juvenalian satire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(proposal, is juvenalian satire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is effective satire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(proposal, is effective satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(proposal, is effective satire)