proposal: is juvenalian satire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amendment
Weight: 0.75
, legislation
Weight: 0.70
, recommendation
Weight: 0.67
, policy
Weight: 0.66
, resolution
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.74
, plan
Weight: 0.71
, cap
Weight: 0.62
, decision
Weight: 0.36
, provision
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is satire 1.00
is juvenalian satire 1.00
be considered satire 0.98
is effective satire 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(proposal, is juvenalian satire)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(proposal, is satire)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(proposal, be considered satire)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(proposal, is effective satire)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(proposal, is satire)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(proposal, is satire)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(proposal, be considered satire)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is satire)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(proposal, is effective satire)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(proposal, be considered satire)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(proposal, be considered satire)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(proposal, is effective satire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is effective satire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is juvenalian satire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(proposal, is juvenalian satire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(proposal, is juvenalian satire)