prostitute: have dress

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, character
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.60
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, story
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geisha
Weight: 0.44
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, homeless person
Weight: 0.36
, old woman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dress 1.00
dress naked 0.86
dress half naked 0.83
dress like sluts 0.81
wear wigs 0.80
wear boots 0.78
wear lipstick 0.75
wear red lipstick 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear lipstick)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prostitute, have dress)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear lipstick)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear lipstick)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(geisha, wear lipstick)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(geisha, wear red lipstick)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear lipstick)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(prostitute, have dress)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(geisha, wear lipstick)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(geisha, wear lipstick)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(geisha, wear red lipstick)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(geisha, wear red lipstick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(prostitute, have dress)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, dress half naked)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, dress like sluts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear boots)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear boots)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear red lipstick)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear boots)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(prostitute, dress like sluts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear boots)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(prostitute, dress half naked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear red lipstick)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(prostitute, dress like sluts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prostitute, dress half naked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(prostitute, dress like sluts)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear red lipstick)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(prostitute, dress half naked)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear red lipstick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prostitute, have dress)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear lipstick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(geisha, wear lipstick)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(geisha, wear red lipstick)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(prostitute, have dress)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear lipstick)