prostitute: wear wigs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, character
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.60
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, story
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geisha
Weight: 0.44
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, homeless person
Weight: 0.36
, old woman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear wigs 1.00
have dress 0.80
wear boots 0.78
wear lipstick 0.77
wear red lipstick 0.76
wear ankle bracelets 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear lipstick)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear lipstick)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear lipstick)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(geisha, wear lipstick)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(geisha, wear red lipstick)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear lipstick)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(geisha, wear lipstick)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(geisha, wear lipstick)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(geisha, wear red lipstick)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(geisha, wear red lipstick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prostitute, have dress)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear boots)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear boots)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear boots)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear boots)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(prostitute, have dress)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear red lipstick)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear ankle bracelets)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear lipstick)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(prostitute, have dress)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear red lipstick)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear red lipstick)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear ankle bracelets)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear red lipstick)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(prostitute, wear ankle bracelets)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(prostitute, wear ankle bracelets)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have dress)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear lipstick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(geisha, wear lipstick)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(geisha, wear red lipstick)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(prostitute, wear wigs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear lipstick)