protocol: be important in computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ssl
Weight: 0.67
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.63
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, ip
Weight: 0.59
, rip
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in computer science 1.00
be important in computer 0.93
be necessary in computer networks 0.81
be in computer networks 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(protocol, be important in computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(protocol, be important in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(protocol, be important in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be important in computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be important in computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(protocol, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in computer science)