protocol: be in computer networks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ssl
Weight: 0.67
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.63
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, ip
Weight: 0.59
, rip
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in computer networks 1.00
be necessary in computer networks 0.97
be needed in networks 0.88
be necessary for networks 0.88
be important in computer 0.85
be important in network communication 0.82
be needed in network 0.82
be important in computer science 0.80
be in data communication 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(protocol, be necessary for networks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(protocol, be in data communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be important in computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(protocol, be in data communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(protocol, be important in computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(protocol, be necessary for networks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(protocol, be needed in network)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(protocol, be important in computer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be important in computer science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in computer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(protocol, be in data communication)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(protocol, be necessary for networks)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(protocol, be needed in network)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in computer science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be needed in network)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(protocol, be needed in network)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(protocol, be important in computer science)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(protocol, be important in computer science)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be necessary for networks)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be in data communication)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)