province: be based on ethno-linguistic regions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.67
, region
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ontario
Weight: 0.66
, free state
Weight: 0.65
, alberta
Weight: 0.65
, quebec
Weight: 0.61
, first nation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be based on regions 1.00
be based on ethno-linguistic regions 1.00
has physical part region 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(province, be based on regions)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(province, be based on regions)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(province, be based on regions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(province, has physical part region)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(province, has physical part region)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(province, has physical part region)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(province, be based on regions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(province, has physical part region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions)