public transport: be bad in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in australia 1.00
be in australia 0.97
be bad in uk 0.87
be in uk bad 0.87
be in canada 0.86
be bad in ireland 0.85
be in canada expensive 0.84
be expensive in canada 0.84
be bad in singapore 0.83
be bad in spain 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, be bad in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in australia)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in spain)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, be bad in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in ireland)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(service, be bad in singapore)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(service, be bad in singapore)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)