public transport: be bad in los angeles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in los angeles 1.00
be bad in la 0.80
important for es 0.79
be bad in spain 0.77
be in palos verdes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, important for es) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(project, important for es)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in spain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in spain)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(project, important for es)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, important for es) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in los angeles)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in la)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in la)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in la)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in la)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(project, important for es)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(project, important for es)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)