public transport: be bad in la

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in la 1.00
be bad in los angeles 0.80
be bad in france 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in la)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in la)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in la)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in los angeles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in los angeles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in los angeles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in los angeles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in la)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in la)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(public transport, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)