service: be bad in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in france 1.00
be produced in france 0.90
be bad in spain 0.86
be bad in europe 0.86
be bad in uk 0.82
be in uk bad 0.82
be bad in ireland 0.81
be bad in australia 0.81
be expensive in usa 0.79
be slow in europe 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in ireland)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be expensive in usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(public transport, be in uk bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in ireland)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(health insurance, be expensive in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be expensive in usa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(service, be bad in france)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(service, be produced in france)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(service, be bad in spain)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(service, be produced in france)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(service, be bad in europe)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(service, be produced in france)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(service, be bad in uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(service, be slow in europe)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in spain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(service, be slow in europe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be slow in europe)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in europe)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, be produced in france)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(service, be slow in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(health insurance, be expensive in usa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in ireland)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia)