service: be produced in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be produced in france 1.00
be bad in france 0.90
be produced 0.77
be bad in spain 0.76
be expensive in usa 0.76
be bad in europe 0.76
be in india 0.76
be in india work 0.76
move around in england 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be expensive in usa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in india work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(health insurance, be expensive in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be expensive in usa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be in india work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in india work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(service, be produced in france)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(service, be bad in france)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in france)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(service, be bad in spain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(service, be bad in europe)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(service, move around in england)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, move around in england)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(service, move around in england)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in spain)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in europe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(service, move around in england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, be produced in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(service, be produced in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(health insurance, be expensive in usa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(public transport, be in india work)