public transport: be in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in uk 1.00
be bad in uk 0.96
be in uk bad 0.96
be in uk expensive 0.94
be expensive in uk 0.94
be in canada 0.85
be in australia 0.83
be in canada expensive 0.83
be expensive in canada 0.83
be in india 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be in uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in uk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(public transport, be in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in uk bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in uk)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(public transport, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)