puck: be use in play hockey

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.59
, journal
Weight: 0.53
, magazine
Weight: 0.51
, jerk
Weight: 0.49
Siblings blade
Weight: 0.30
, homer
Weight: 0.30
, villain
Weight: 0.30
, arrow
Weight: 0.30
, atom
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be use in play hockey 1.00
be used to play hockey 0.98
be used to play hockey with 0.98
be use in hockey game 0.98
be at ice hockey game 0.92
be a part of hockey stick 0.91
be at hockey rink 0.89
be used to score goal in hockey 0.86
be at play in play 0.82
be at play in theater 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(puck, be use in play hockey)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(character, be at play in theater)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(puck, be use in play hockey)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(character, be at play in play)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(character, be at play in theater)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in theater)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(blade, be a part of hockey stick)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(character, be at play in theater)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(blade, be a part of hockey stick)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(blade, be a part of hockey stick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(puck, be use in play hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(puck, be used to play hockey with)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(puck, be at ice hockey game)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(puck, be use in hockey game)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(puck, be used to score goal in hockey)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(puck, be used to play hockey)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(puck, be use in play hockey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(character, be at play in play)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(character, be at play in theater)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(blade, be a part of hockey stick)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(character, be at play in play)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(puck, be use in play hockey)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(character, be at play in theater)