pun: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, joke
Weight: 0.50
, form
Weight: 0.48
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.35
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, shit
Weight: 0.33
, lyric
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
jokes 0.94
be considered jokes 0.91
be considered bad jokes 0.90
be allowed on r jokes 0.86
be superior to other joke type 0.78
be called puns 0.78
poor form of humor 0.78
be considered poor form of humor 0.78
is funny 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(joke, is funny)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pun, has quality jokes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(joke, is funny)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(joke, is funny)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cliche, has quality jokes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shit, is funny)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fart, is funny)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(joke, is funny)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cliche, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cliche, has quality jokes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fart, is funny)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fart, is funny)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(shit, is funny)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(shit, is funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pun, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pun, jokes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pun, jokes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pun, jokes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pun, be considered jokes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pun, be considered jokes)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pun, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(joke, is funny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cliche, has quality jokes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shit, is funny)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fart, is funny)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pun, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(joke, is funny)