quality: be increased

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents standard
Weight: 0.66
, value
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.71
, speed
Weight: 0.70
, accuracy
Weight: 0.68
, honesty
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be increased 1.00
be decreased on challenges 0.85
be improved 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be increased)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be increased)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(quality, be increased)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(quality, be decreased on challenges)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(quality, be decreased on challenges)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(quality, be decreased on challenges)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(quality, be decreased on challenges)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, be improved)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(quality, be improved)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quality, be improved)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(quality, be increased)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(quality, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(accuracy, be increased)