quality: be on phones bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents standard
Weight: 0.66
, value
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.71
, speed
Weight: 0.70
, accuracy
Weight: 0.68
, honesty
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on phones bad 1.00
be poor on telephones 0.84
be bad on snapchat 0.79
be bad on instagram 0.79
be for laptops 0.78
be bad from iphone to android 0.76
be poor from iphone to android 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be on phones bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be poor on telephones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be poor on telephones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be poor on telephones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad from iphone to android)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad from iphone to android)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad from iphone to android)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(quality, be poor from iphone to android)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(quality, be poor from iphone to android)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(quality, be poor from iphone to android)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be poor on telephones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(quality, be for laptops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(quality, be for laptops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(quality, be for laptops)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad from iphone to android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(quality, be poor from iphone to android)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(quality, be for laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be on phones bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on phones bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be on phones bad)