queensland: was settled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, country
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.47
, event
Weight: 0.46
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.33
, brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, western australia
Weight: 0.33
, idaho
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was settled 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(queensland, was settled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(australia, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(australia, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, was settled)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was settled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(queensland, was settled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(western australia, was settled)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tasmania, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tasmania, was settled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(queensland, was settled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(queensland, was settled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(queensland, was settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(australia, was settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tasmania, was settled)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(western australia, was settled)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(queensland, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(australia, was settled)