question: be important in sales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.66
, answer
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.66
, big bang
Weight: 0.65
, argument
Weight: 0.62
, penis
Weight: 0.59
, rumor
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in sales 1.00
be important in business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(question, be important in sales)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(question, be important in sales)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fairness, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(question, be important in sales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in sales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(question, be important in sales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(question, be important in sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)