rabbit: be considered pests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, rodent
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.67
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.74
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.39
, cat
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered pests 1.00
has state pests 0.96
be considered pests in australia 0.91
farmers pests 0.90
have in zealand pests 0.88
have in australia pests 0.88
has state pest 0.87
pests in australia 0.87
have in new zealand pests 0.87
get mites 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, be considered pests)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, farmers pests)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, has state pest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rabbit, farmers pests)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, farmers pests)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, farmers pests)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be considered pests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(rabbit, be considered pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rabbit, be considered pests)