rabbit: has state pest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, rodent
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.67
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.74
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.39
, cat
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pest 1.00
has state pests 0.91
be pest in australia 0.89
be considered pests 0.87
farmers pests 0.84
be considered pests in australia 0.82
have in australia pests 0.82
pests in australia 0.81
have in zealand pests 0.81
have in new zealand pests 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, has state pest)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, be pest in australia)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, be considered pests)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, be pest in australia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rabbit, be considered pests)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be pest in australia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, farmers pests)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be considered pests)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, farmers pests)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rabbit, farmers pests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be pest in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be considered pests)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, farmers pests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pest)