rabbit: has physical part ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, rodent
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.67
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.74
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.39
, cat
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ears 1.00
has physical part ear 0.93
have long ears 0.90
have big ears 0.89
have different ears 0.89
have down ears 0.88
have large ears 0.87
be with longer ears 0.87
have cold ears 0.86
have hot ears 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, have big ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(guinea pig, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(rabbit, has physical part ears)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have big ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rabbit, have long ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rabbit, have big ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rabbit, have big ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(rabbit, have big ears)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(rabbit, have long ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have big ears)