rabbit: have long ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, rodent
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.67
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.74
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.39
, cat
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long ears 1.00
be with longer ears 0.93
have big ears 0.93
survive with long ears 0.93
have different ears 0.92
have down ears 0.92
have large ears 0.91
have cold ears 0.91
have hot ears 0.91
has physical part ears 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, have big ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(guinea pig, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(rabbit, have long ears)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(rabbit, have big ears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rabbit, have big ears)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have big ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rabbit, have big ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rabbit, have long ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have big ears)