radiation: be good for use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for use 1.00
be used for 0.86
be bad for people 0.82
be used 0.79
has quality bad 0.78
be used in real world 0.78
be best looking 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, be best looking)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(irradiation, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemical, be used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(chemical, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chemical, be used)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(gamma radiation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(irradiation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(irradiation, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(gamma radiation, be best looking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, be best looking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(radiation, be good for use)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(radiation, be bad for people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(radiation, be bad for people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be bad for people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(radiation, be used in real world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(radiation, be used in real world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be used in real world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(radiation, be bad for people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(radiation, be used in real world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(radiation, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(radiation, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(radiation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(radiation, be good for use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chemical, be used)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, be best looking)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(irradiation, has quality bad)