radiator cap: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cap
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.53
, leak
Weight: 0.51
, car
Weight: 0.34
Siblings valve
Weight: 0.32
, duct tape
Weight: 0.32
, gas tank
Weight: 0.32
, helmet
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(radiator cap, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(leak, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(radiator cap, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(leak, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cap, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(leak, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cap, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(valve, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(helmet, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(radiator cap, go bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(leak, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(radiator cap, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(valve, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(valve, go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(helmet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(helmet, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(radiator cap, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(radiator cap, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(radiator cap, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(radiator cap, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(radiator cap, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(leak, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cap, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(valve, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(helmet, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(leak, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(radiator cap, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cap, has quality bad)