radiator: be made of aluminum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooling device
Weight: 0.68
, heating element
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.55
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hose
Weight: 0.54
, heat sink
Weight: 0.34
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33
, compressor
Weight: 0.33
, heat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of aluminum 1.00
be made of metal gcse 0.86
be made of metal 0.86
be made from metal 0.85
be made out of metal 0.84
is metal 0.80
be made out of plastic 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(heat sink, be made of aluminum)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(heat sink, be made of metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(heat sink, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(heat sink, be made of aluminum)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(heat sink, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(heat sink, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made of metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(radiator, be made of metal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(radiator, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(radiator, is metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(radiator, be made from metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made from metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made from metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(radiator, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(radiator, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radiator, be made from metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radiator, is metal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(heat sink, be made of aluminum)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(heat sink, be made of metal)