radiator: be made out of plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooling device
Weight: 0.68
, heating element
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.55
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hose
Weight: 0.54
, heat sink
Weight: 0.34
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33
, compressor
Weight: 0.33
, heat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made out of plastic 1.00
be made out of metal 0.86
be made from metal 0.82
be made of metal gcse 0.81
be made of metal 0.81
be made out of iron 0.79
be made of aluminum 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(heat sink, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(heat sink, be made of aluminum)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(heat sink, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(heat sink, be made of metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(heat sink, be made of aluminum)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(heat sink, be made of aluminum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(radiator, be made of metal gcse)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made of metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(radiator, be made of metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(radiator, be made of metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(radiator, be made from metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radiator, be made from metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made from metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made from metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radiator, be made of aluminum)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(radiator, be made out of iron)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made of aluminum)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(radiator, be made of aluminum)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made of aluminum)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of iron)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(radiator, be made out of iron)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(radiator, be made out of iron)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(radiator, be made out of plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(heat sink, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be made out of plastic)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(heat sink, be made of aluminum)