radio telescope: have power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have power 1.00
have poor power 0.88
have relatively poor power 0.80
have poor resolving power 0.76
have resolving power 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have power)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have poor power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor power)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have resolving power)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have poor power)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have poor power)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor power)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have resolving power)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor power)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have poor power)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have resolving power)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor power)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have resolving power)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio telescope, have power)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have power)