radio: be better than television

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio station
Weight: 0.72
, broadcast
Weight: 0.69
, television
Weight: 0.68
, show
Weight: 0.65
, network
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.42
, television show
Weight: 0.36
, television series
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than television 1.00
be better than tv 0.90
compare with television 0.87
be faster than tv 0.86
be one broadcast across country 0.79
be better than books 0.78
be more popular than cinema 0.76
appears with grains inside television 0.76
come in better 0.75
play commercials at same time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(radio station, play commercials at same time)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(television, appears with grains inside television)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(radio station, come in better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(television, be more popular than cinema)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(television, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(television, be better than books)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(television, be more popular than cinema)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(radio station, come in better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(television, appears with grains inside television)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(radio station, play commercials at same time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(television, be better than books)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(television, be more popular than cinema)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(television, appears with grains inside television)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(radio station, play commercials at same time)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(radio station, come in better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(radio station, play commercials at same time)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(television, appears with grains inside television)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(radio station, come in better)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(television, be more popular than cinema)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(television, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(radio, be better than television)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(radio, compare with television)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radio, compare with television)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(radio, compare with television)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(radio, compare with television)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radio, be faster than tv)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(radio, be better than tv)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(radio, be faster than tv)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than tv)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than tv)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(radio, be better than tv)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(radio, be faster than tv)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(radio, be faster than tv)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radio, be one broadcast across country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio, be one broadcast across country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(radio, be one broadcast across country)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(radio, be one broadcast across country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(television, be better than books)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(radio station, come in better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(television, be more popular than cinema)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(television, appears with grains inside television)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio station, play commercials at same time)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(television, be better than books)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(radio station, come in better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(television, be more popular than cinema)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(television, appears with grains inside television)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(radio, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio station, play commercials at same time)