radio: compare with television

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio station
Weight: 0.72
, broadcast
Weight: 0.69
, television
Weight: 0.68
, show
Weight: 0.65
, network
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.42
, television show
Weight: 0.36
, television series
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare with television 1.00
be better than television 0.87
be better than tv 0.79
be one broadcast across country 0.79
be faster than tv 0.75
remake tv shows for children 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(network, remake tv shows for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(radio, compare with television)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(network, remake tv shows for children)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(network, remake tv shows for children)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(network, remake tv shows for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(radio, compare with television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(radio, compare with television)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(radio, be better than television)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than television)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio, be better than television)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than television)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radio, be faster than tv)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(radio, be faster than tv)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(radio, be better than tv)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(radio, be better than tv)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, be better than tv)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(radio, be faster than tv)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(radio, be better than tv)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(radio, be faster than tv)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radio, be one broadcast across country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio, be one broadcast across country)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(radio, be one broadcast across country)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(radio, be one broadcast across country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radio, compare with television)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(radio, compare with television)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(network, remake tv shows for children)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(radio, compare with television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(network, remake tv shows for children)