rail: be in 2015

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, platform
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.58
, utility
Weight: 0.57
Siblings streetcar
Weight: 0.36
, tunnel
Weight: 0.34
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, postal service
Weight: 0.34
, highway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pietermaritzburg 1.00
be in 2015 1.00
be organised 0.88
be 10 0.88
be for ftms 0.86
be in stuttgart work 0.78
have speedlimits 0.77
be in in city 0.76
is are hit now 0.75
be important in work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(utility, is are hit now)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rail, be in 2015)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rail, be in 2015)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(service, be organised)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(utility, is are hit now)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(service, be organised)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(utility, is are hit now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in stuttgart work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(highway, be 10)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(highway, be in in city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(highway, have speedlimits)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(utility, is are hit now)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rail, be in 2015)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(highway, be 10)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(highway, be 10)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(public transport, be in stuttgart work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in stuttgart work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(highway, be in in city)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(highway, be in in city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(highway, have speedlimits)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(highway, have speedlimits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rail, be in 2015)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rail, be in 2015)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, be organised)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(utility, is are hit now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(public transport, be in stuttgart work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(highway, be in in city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(highway, be 10)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(highway, have speedlimits)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, be organised)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rail, be in 2015)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(utility, is are hit now)