service: be organised

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be organised 1.00
be in pietermaritzburg 0.88
be for ftms 0.84
be by state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(service, be organised)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(service, be organised)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, be organised)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in pietermaritzburg)