health insurance: be by state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be by state 1.00
has state state 0.90
be provided by government 0.77
has state front 0.77
be in stockbridge 0.77
be in obx 0.77
has state problem 0.76
has state company 0.76
be organised 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be provided by government) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(retirement, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(retirement, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(coverage, be in stockbridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coverage, be in obx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in obx)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(service, be organised)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(retirement, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in stockbridge)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(retirement, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(service, be provided by government)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(insurance, has state company)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in obx)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in stockbridge)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(retirement, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(retirement, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(service, be provided by government)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(service, be organised)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has state front)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(retirement, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be provided by government) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(retirement, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(coverage, be in stockbridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coverage, be in obx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(service, be organised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be by state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mortgage, has state front) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has state front)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(health insurance, be by state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health insurance, be by state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, be organised)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(retirement, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coverage, be in obx)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(retirement, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(coverage, be in stockbridge)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(service, be provided by government)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has state company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mortgage, has state front)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, be organised)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(retirement, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coverage, be in obx)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(retirement, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(coverage, be in stockbridge)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(service, be provided by government)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health insurance, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has state company)