rail: has shape joints

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, platform
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.58
, utility
Weight: 0.57
Siblings streetcar
Weight: 0.36
, tunnel
Weight: 0.34
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, postal service
Weight: 0.34
, highway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has shape joints 1.00
be built with expansion joints 0.84
has shape joint 0.80
has physical part grooves 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(highway, has physical part grooves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(highway, has physical part grooves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, has physical part grooves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rail, has shape joints)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(rail, has shape joint)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rail, has shape joint)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rail, has shape joint)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rail, has shape joint)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rail, has shape joints)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rail, has shape joints)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rail, has shape joints)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(highway, has physical part grooves)