rally: has quality wheels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.67
, action
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, gathering
Weight: 0.56
Siblings march
Weight: 0.36
, parade
Weight: 0.34
, demonstration
Weight: 0.34
, national convention
Weight: 0.33
, memorial day
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wheels 1.00
wheels 0.94
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rally, has quality wheels)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(rally, wheels)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rally, wheels)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rally, wheels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rally, wheels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rally, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rally, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rally, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality wheels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rally, has quality wheels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality good)