ram: be required in computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings aries
Weight: 0.39
, badger
Weight: 0.33
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.32
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.32
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be required in computer 1.00
be needed in computer 0.93
be used in computer 0.91
be in computer 0.90
be important to computer 0.89
be in computer work 0.89
make computer faster 0.83
affect performance of computer 0.80
affects computer performance 0.78
be important in laptop 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ram, be required in computer)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ram, be needed in computer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ram, be needed in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ram, be needed in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(ram, be in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ram, be in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ram, be used in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ram, be in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(ram, be used in computer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ram, be used in computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ram, be important to computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ram, be used in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ram, be in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ram, be needed in computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ram, affects computer performance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ram, affects computer performance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ram, affects computer performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ram, be important to computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ram, affects computer performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ram, be required in computer)