ram: influence the over performance of computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings aries
Weight: 0.39
, badger
Weight: 0.33
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.32
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.32
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence the over performance of computer 1.00
influence over performance of computer 0.99
influence performance of computer 0.97
affect performance of computer 0.90
affects computer performance 0.84
be used in computer 0.80
be in computer work 0.80
be in computer 0.80
be important to computer 0.79
be needed in computer 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(ram, influence over performance of computer)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ram, influence over performance of computer)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ram, influence over performance of computer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ram, influence over performance of computer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ram, affects computer performance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ram, affects computer performance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ram, affects computer performance)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(ram, be in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ram, be in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ram, be used in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ram, be in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(ram, be used in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ram, be used in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ram, be needed in computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ram, be needed in computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ram, be needed in computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ram, be important to computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ram, be used in computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ram, be in computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ram, affects computer performance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ram, be needed in computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ram, be important to computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ram, influence the over performance of computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ram, influence the over performance of computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ram, influence the over performance of computer)