ranch: be good on pizza

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, horse
Weight: 0.57
, farm
Weight: 0.55
Siblings matador
Weight: 0.40
, mustang
Weight: 0.33
, campsite
Weight: 0.33
, rodeo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good on pizza 1.00
be good at restaurants 0.79
be from restaurants taste better 0.78
be better at restaurants 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ranch, be good on pizza)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ranch, be better at restaurants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on pizza)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ranch, be good on pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ranch, be good on pizza)