ranch: be good at restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, horse
Weight: 0.57
, farm
Weight: 0.55
Siblings matador
Weight: 0.40
, mustang
Weight: 0.33
, campsite
Weight: 0.33
, rodeo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good at restaurants 1.00
be better at restaurants 0.98
be from restaurants 0.95
be from restaurants taste better 0.92
be from restaurants taste 0.91
dress better in restaurants 0.89
be good on pizza 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on pizza)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ranch, be good on pizza)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ranch, be good on pizza)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ranch, be good on pizza)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants)