ranch: be from restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, horse
Weight: 0.57
, farm
Weight: 0.55
Siblings matador
Weight: 0.40
, mustang
Weight: 0.33
, campsite
Weight: 0.33
, rodeo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from restaurants 1.00
be good at restaurants 0.95
be better at restaurants 0.94
be from restaurants taste 0.94
be from restaurants taste better 0.91
dress better in restaurants 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants)