ranch: be from restaurants taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, horse
Weight: 0.57
, farm
Weight: 0.55
Siblings matador
Weight: 0.40
, mustang
Weight: 0.33
, campsite
Weight: 0.33
, rodeo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from restaurants taste 1.00
be from restaurants taste better 0.98
be from restaurants 0.94
be good at restaurants 0.91
be better at restaurants 0.90
dress better in restaurants 0.86
taste different 0.82
make about everything taste 0.79
make about just everything taste 0.78
make about everything taste better 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ranch, dress better in restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ranch, be good at restaurants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ranch, be better at restaurants)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ranch, taste different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ranch, taste different)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ranch, make about just everything taste)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ranch, taste different)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ranch, taste different)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ranch, make about just everything taste)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ranch, make about just everything taste)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ranch, make about just everything taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be from restaurants taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ranch, be from restaurants taste)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ranch, be from restaurants taste)